Fox News

Fox News 3 Feb 2020

Jordan, Meadows react to Schiff having 'no regrets' about Dems' case

Description:

Republican Reps. Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows, members of President Trump's defense team, speak out ahead of the final impeachment vote on 'Fox & Friends.'

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),


Jalen Rose and David Jacoby react to Damian Lillard's comments that he wouldn't play games in the remainder of the 2019-20 NBA season if the Portland Trail Blazers didn't have the chance to make the playoffs. They also (2:24) react to new audio showing Michael Jordan did refuse to play for the 1992 Dream Team if rival Isiah Thomas were on the team.
#NBA #Sports

✔️
Former Utah State Aggies QB Jordan Love joins NFL Live to talk about his prospects in the 2020 NFL draft, the skills he's been working on in the offseason, his weaknesses and how he's trying to improve them, the question he gets asked the most by NFL coaches during the pre-draft process, the comparisons he's hearing to Kansas City Chiefs QB Patrick Mahomes, and remembering his late father.
#NFL #Sports #NFLDraft

✔️
Tony Reali, Mina Kimes, Tim Cowlishaw and Israel Gutierrez discuss Michael Jordan's feud with Isiah Thomas and the Detroit Pistons walking off the court after losing to the Chicago Bulls in the 1991 Eastern Conference finals.
#AroundtheHorn #NBA

✔️
Arizona Congressmember Debbie Lesko comments on the actions taken by AZ's Governor Doug Ducey to reopen the state's retail businesses, and various 'non-essential' operations, plus gives reaction to new details in the Michael Flynn case and more. - with Newsmax TV's Shaun Kraisman and Emma Rechenberg

For breaking news & expert analysis,

… show captions ↓
INTERNET SENSATION. OVER TO YOU, BRIAN.
OVER TO YOU, BRIAN. BRIAN: AINSLEY, AHEAD OF TODAY’S
BRIAN: AINSLEY, AHEAD OF TODAY’S CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN THE
CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IMPEACHMENT
IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IMPEACHMENT MANAGER ADAM SCHIFF CLAIMS HE
MANAGER ADAM SCHIFF CLAIMS HE HAS NO REGRETS.
HAS NO REGRETS. >> THERE’S NOTHING THAT I COULD
>> THERE’S NOTHING THAT I COULD SEE THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE
SEE THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE AS THE
DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE AS THE SENATORS HAVE ADMITTED, WE HAVE
SENATORS HAVE ADMITTED, WE HAVE PROVED OUR CASE.
PROVED OUR CASE. BRIAN: GOP CONGRESSMAN MARK
BRIAN: GOP CONGRESSMAN MARK MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN, KNOW
MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN, KNOW ADAM SCHIFF QUITE WELL, HE SAYS
ADAM SCHIFF QUITE WELL, HE SAYS HE HAS NO REGRETS, WHAT WOULD HE
HE HAS NO REGRETS, WHAT WOULD HE ACTUALLY SAY, DO YOU THINK HE
ACTUALLY SAY, DO YOU THINK HE BELIEVES IT?
BELIEVES IT? [LAUGHTER]
[LAUGHTER] >> , NO HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IT,
>> , NO HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IT, HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT
HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HE’S THE ONE
THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT HE HAD NO
THAT TOLD US THAT HE HAD NO CONTACT WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER,
CONTACT WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HOW MANY TIMES HAS ADAM SCHIFF
HOW MANY TIMES HAS ADAM SCHIFF MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT
MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT OUR COUNTRY HAS LIVED THERE, THE
OUR COUNTRY HAS LIVED THERE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE IT FOR WHAT
AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE IT FOR WHAT IT IS.
IT IS. >> CONGRESSMAN, RIGHT NOW, WE
>> CONGRESSMAN, RIGHT NOW, WE WILL HEAR MORE OF THE SAME
WILL HEAR MORE OF THE SAME RHETORIC TODAY, WE WILL TAKE A
RHETORIC TODAY, WE WILL TAKE A PAUSE TUESDAY AND THEN WEDNESDAY
PAUSE TUESDAY AND THEN WEDNESDAY YOU’LL HAVE THE EXONERATION BY
YOU’LL HAVE THE EXONERATION BY ALL ACCOUNTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK
ALL ACCOUNTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE CHANCES OF DEMOCRATS
ABOUT THE CHANCES OF DEMOCRATS FLIPPING OVER FROM JOE MANCHIN
FLIPPING OVER FROM JOE MANCHIN ON DOWN?
ON DOWN? >> WELL, THEY BASE IT ON THE
>> WELL, THEY BASE IT ON THE FACT THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN
FACT THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN JUST JOE MANCHIN BUT WHEN YOU
JUST JOE MANCHIN BUT WHEN YOU HAVE A BIPARTISAN VOTE AGAINST
HAVE A BIPARTISAN VOTE AGAINST IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE AND YOU
IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE AND YOU HAVE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL, IT
HAVE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL, IT SHOWS THAT, INDEED, THERE WAS NO
SHOWS THAT, INDEED, THERE WAS NO MERITS TO THIS CASE AND WE’VE
MERITS TO THIS CASE AND WE’VE GOT TO STOP THIS FROM EVER BEING
GOT TO STOP THIS FROM EVER BEING AN IMPACT ON NOT ONLY THIS
AN IMPACT ON NOT ONLY THIS PRESIDENT BUT ANY FUTURE
PRESIDENT BUT ANY FUTURE PRESIDENT, BUT I I’M OPTIMISTIC
PRESIDENT, BUT I I’M OPTIMISTIC THAT THEY’LL BE A BIPARTISAN
THAT THEY’LL BE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL.
ACQUITTAL. >> VERY INTERESTING, WE KNOW
>> VERY INTERESTING, WE KNOW IT’S NOT GETTING CLOSE TO 67, IF
IT’S NOT GETTING CLOSE TO 67, IF WE GET MANCHIN AND WHO KNOWS WHO
WE GET MANCHIN AND WHO KNOWS WHO ELSE, A FEW CROSS OVER IN THE
ELSE, A FEW CROSS OVER IN THE HOUSE.
HOUSE. SPEAKING OF THE HOUSE, ARE WE
SPEAKING OF THE HOUSE, ARE WE GOING TO SEE MORE
GOING TO SEE MORE INVESTIGATIONS, CAROL MALOENY
INVESTIGATIONS, CAROL MALOENY SAYING BECAUSE THIS IS OVER THE
SAYING BECAUSE THIS IS OVER THE INVESTIGATIONS AREN’T GOING TO
INVESTIGATIONS AREN’T GOING TO STOP, JORDAN?
STOP, JORDAN? >> NO, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO
>> NO, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO STOP, REMEMBER THEY STARTED
STOP, REMEMBER THEY STARTED BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT,
BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT, JULY 2016 WHEN IMPEACHMENT
JULY 2016 WHEN IMPEACHMENT REALLY BEGAN, SO-TRUMP RUSSIA
REALLY BEGAN, SO-TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION WHICH WAS A JOKE,
COLLUSION WHICH WAS A JOKE, REMEMBER, THEY WENT TO FISA
REMEMBER, THEY WENT TO FISA COURT AND LIED TO THE COURT 17
COURT AND LIED TO THE COURT 17 TIMES, INTERESTING HEARING
TIMES, INTERESTING HEARING COMING UP THIS WEEK WITH THE
COMING UP THIS WEEK WITH THE IMPEACHMENT IOWA CAUCUS, THERE’S
IMPEACHMENT IOWA CAUCUS, THERE’S A HEARING WHERE FBI DIRECTOR
A HEARING WHERE FBI DIRECTOR CHRIS WRAY WILL BE TESTIFYING IN
CHRIS WRAY WILL BE TESTIFYING IN FRONT OF JUDICIARY COMMITTEE,
FRONT OF JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, WHAT’S GOING TO CHANGE WHEN IT
WHAT’S GOING TO CHANGE WHEN IT COMES TO FISA COURT OPERATES AN
COMES TO FISA COURT OPERATES AN MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT THE FBI
MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT THE FBI DOES WHEN THEY GO TO FISA COURT.
DOES WHEN THEY GO TO FISA COURT. >> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S
>> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S INTERESTING, CAROL IS TALKING
INTERESTING, CAROL IS TALKING ABOUT ADDITIONAL HEARINGS, ONE
ABOUT ADDITIONAL HEARINGS, ONE OF THE HEARINGS SHE’S NOT
OF THE HEARINGS SHE’S NOT WILLING TO HAVE INSPECTOR
WILLING TO HAVE INSPECTOR HOROWITZ TO COME IN AND TALK
HOROWITZ TO COME IN AND TALK ABOUT FISA ABUSE AND WHAT WE
ABOUT FISA ABUSE AND WHAT WE NEED TO DO, WHEN IT COMES TO
NEED TO DO, WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE
GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM, SHE WANTS THE LOOK THE
PROBLEM, SHE WANTS THE LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND THIS IS NO
OTHER WAY AND THIS IS NO DIFFERENT.
DIFFERENT. BRIEN: WOULD THE SENATE DO THAT,
BRIEN: WOULD THE SENATE DO THAT, CONGRESSMAN JORDAN?
CONGRESSMAN JORDAN? I WANT TO SEE HUNTER BIDEN OR
I WANT TO SEE HUNTER BIDEN OR ARE THEY PLAYING A GAME, PART OF
ARE THEY PLAYING A GAME, PART OF PLAYING A GAME THAT ONLY
PLAYING A GAME THAT ONLY BENEFITS LAWMAKERS AND NOT THE
BENEFITS LAWMAKERS AND NOT THE COUNTRY.
COUNTRY. >> WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE
>> WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS DONE A
ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS DONE A GREAT JOB HAS PUT JOHN DURHAM IN
GREAT JOB HAS PUT JOHN DURHAM IN LOOKING AT ISSUE AS WELL,
LOOKING AT ISSUE AS WELL, SENATOR JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT
SENATOR JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT HE WANTS TO LOOK INTO THE
HE WANTS TO LOOK INTO THE ISSUES, THE BIDEN ISSUE AS WELL
ISSUES, THE BIDEN ISSUE AS WELL AS THE WHOLE FISA THING, SO I
AS THE WHOLE FISA THING, SO I THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT
THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT THAT AND THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE,
THAT AND THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE, IT’S NOT GOING TO GET DONE WITH
IT’S NOT GOING TO GET DONE WITH JERRY NADLER AND CAROL MALONEY.
JERRY NADLER AND CAROL MALONEY. BRIAN: YOU’LL HAVE PRESIDENTIAL
BRIAN: YOU’LL HAVE PRESIDENTIAL RESPECT AND EAR, IF THERE’S
RESPECT AND EAR, IF THERE’S SOMETHING TO BE LEARNED FROM
SOMETHING TO BE LEARNED FROM THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, IF IT WAS
THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, IF IT WAS IN FACT, AVOIDABLE, WHAT DO YOU
IN FACT, AVOIDABLE, WHAT DO YOU HOPE THE PRESIDENT TAKES FROM
HOPE THE PRESIDENT TAKES FROM THEM, THE VULNERABILITY WAS
THEM, THE VULNERABILITY WAS THERE TO PUT THE HOUSE THROUGH
THERE TO PUT THE HOUSE THROUGH THE IMPEACHMENT, SO WHAT DO YOU
THE IMPEACHMENT, SO WHAT DO YOU HOPE HE LEARNS FROM THIS?
HOPE HE LEARNS FROM THIS? >> WELL, I THINK THE BIGGEST
>> WELL, I THINK THE BIGGEST THING IS WE ARE IN A PARTISAN
THING IS WE ARE IN A PARTISAN POLITICAL DIVIDE RIGHT NOW, THAT
POLITICAL DIVIDE RIGHT NOW, THAT IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW PERFECT
IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW PERFECT ANYTHING IS, YOU HAVE TO BE
ANYTHING IS, YOU HAVE TO BE PREPARED FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS
PREPARED FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO DO.
ARE GOING TO DO. BUT I THINK FOR THE AMERICAN
BUT I THINK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND,
PEOPLE THEY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, LISTEN, JIM AND I, WE WERE IN
LISTEN, JIM AND I, WE WERE IN EVERY SINGLE DEPOSITION, IF YOU
EVERY SINGLE DEPOSITION, IF YOU LOOKED AT THE FACTS THEY
LOOKED AT THE FACTS THEY WOULDN’T HAVE IMPEACHED HIM AT
WOULDN’T HAVE IMPEACHED HIM AT ALL AND WOULDN’T HAVE GONE TO
ALL AND WOULDN’T HAVE GONE TO THE SENATE, HE NEEDS TO CALL IT
THE SENATE, HE NEEDS TO CALL IT OUT FOR WHAT IT IS, POLITICS,
OUT FOR WHAT IT IS, POLITICS, HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET BACK ON
HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET BACK ON FOCUSING TO WHAT MATTERS, LET’S
FOCUSING TO WHAT MATTERS, LET’S LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES
LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES AND GUESS WHAT, HE’S ON THAT.
AND GUESS WHAT, HE’S ON THAT. >> 20 SECOND.
>> 20 SECOND. I KNOW YOU HAVE RESPECT FOR
I KNOW YOU HAVE RESPECT FOR TACTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, HOW
TACTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, HOW -- WHY DID HE PLAY THE WAY SHE
-- WHY DID HE PLAY THE WAY SHE DID, WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DID
DID, WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DID THIS?
THIS? >> YEAH, THEY NEVER EXPECTED
>> YEAH, THEY NEVER EXPECTED WHAT WAS GOING TO PLAY OUT, YOU
WHAT WAS GOING TO PLAY OUT, YOU GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 24TH,
GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 24TH, BRIAN, WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED THEY
BRIAN, WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED THEY WILL DO IMPEACHMENT
WILL DO IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, THEY WOULD HAVE
INVESTIGATION, THEY WOULD HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT EVERY
NEVER PREDICTED THAT EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE
SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIM, AND
WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIM, AND FOURTH DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE WITH
FOURTH DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE WITH US AND SWITCH PARTIES AND ON
US AND SWITCH PARTIES AND ON WEDNESDAY WHEN IT’S A BIPARTISAN
WEDNESDAY WHEN IT’S A BIPARTISAN MAJORITY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THEY
MAJORITY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THEY HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT
HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT EITHER, SHE MESSED THIS UP ALL
EITHER, SHE MESSED THIS UP ALL THE WAY AROUND, BECAUSE AGAIN
THE WAY AROUND, BECAUSE AGAIN THE FACTS WERE ON THE
THE FACTS WERE ON THE PRESIDENT’S SIDE.
PRESIDENT’S SIDE. BRIAN: BELIEVE ME I WAS IN
BRIAN: BELIEVE ME I WAS IN MIAMI, NOBODY WAS TALKING ABOUT
MIAMI, NOBODY WAS TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.
IMPEACHMENT. NO ONE TALKED ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.

Share Video:

Embed Video: