Fox Business Network

Fox Business Network 27 Dec 2019

Impeachment distracts from Dems' 'far left' agenda: Rep. Reschenthaler

Description:

Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, (R-Penn.) discusses how the impeachment has distracted Americans from the booming U.S. economy and Democrats' policies.


Democrats say they won't pass anything that doesn't include a laundry list of unrelated items. #FoxNews #Hannity

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),
Relive the dramatic impeachment process of President Donald Trump from the hearings in the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees, the House vote, Senate trial and acquittal.
Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-NY, and Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-FL, respond to Chuck Schumer's rhetoric involving Supreme Court justices. #FoxNews #IngrahamAngle

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),
Democrats slam White House's 'dangerous incompetence' on coronavirus response; reaction and analysis on 'Outnumbered.' #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),

… show captions ↓
REINED IN YOU TAKE TRADE OFF
THE TABLE THE HORSE IS
RUNNING.
CHERYL: MARKETS DOING DESPITE
IMPEACHMENT STANDOFF DEMOCRATS
ARE WASTING TIME THEIR PUSH
FOR WITNESSES AND IMPEACHMENT
TRIAL IN THE SENATE LET'S
BRING IN PENNSYLVANIA
CONGRESSMAN HOUSE JUDICIARY
COMMITTEE MEMBER HOUSE ARMED
SERVICES COMMITTEE MEMBER,
CONGRESSMAN GOOD MORNING.
>> MERRY CHRISTMAS THANKS FOR
HAVING ME ON.
CHERYL: I HAVE TO ASK YOU WE
ARE DISCUSSING THE MARKETS
THIS MORNING IN MIDDLE WHAT
HAVE HAS CONSUMED WASHINGTON,
KISS THE BATTLE OVER
IMPEACHMENT, IMPEACHING
PRESIDENT TRUMP.
YOUR REACTION TO THAT?
>> WELL WE HAVE TO REDEEM
IMPEACHMENT FIASCO HAS IN PART
BEEN A DISTRACTION FROM TWO
THINGS THE LONGER TALKING
ABOUT IMPEACHMENT, IT MEANS
WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE
RED-HOT TRUMP ECONOMY SO IT IS
A DISTRACTION, ALSO, THE MORE
WE TALK ABOUT IMPEACHMENT, WE
ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE
DEMOCRATS AGENDA WHICH IS GONE
FAR LEFT WE'RE NOT TALKING
ABOUT THE GREEN NEW DEAL
ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS NOT
TALKING ABOUT GIVING,
TAXPAYERS FUNDED HEALTH CARE
TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS NOT
TALKING ABOUT FAR LEFT READY
CAL AGENDA NOT TAKING RED HOT
TRUMP ECONOMY WE ARE TALKING
ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.
>> I DO WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT
THE CRITICISM AGAIN SENATE
MAJORITY LEADER MITCH
MCCONNELL PRETTY WIDESPREAD HE
PRELIMINARIED TO WORK CLOSELY
WITH WHITE HOUSE ON
IMPEACHMENT TRIAL MAY BE NOT
TO WITNESSES AT ALL
INTERESTING YOU HAD SENATOR
MURKOWSKI SAYING SHE WAS
DISTURBED BY THAT I WANT YOUR
REACTION TO SENATOR
MURKOWSKI'S COMMENTS MADE TO
AN ALA
AN AALASKA TV STATION.
>> SHE ALSO BLASTED SPEAKER
PELOSI SAID NANCY PELOSI
RUSHED THIS THROUGH HAD A
POLITICAL TIME LINE TRYING TO
GET TO SENATE BEFORE CHRISTMAS
BUT MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS ONLY
PICKING UP HER CRITICISM OF
MCCONNELL NUMBER ONE, NUMBER
TWO, THIS HAS BEEN A POLITICAL
HIT JOB FROM THE BEGINNING.
IF YOU WANT FAIRNESS GO BACK A
FEW MONTHS WHY WAS PRESIDENT
TRUMP NOT AAFFORDED AN
ATTORNEY WHY WAS HE NOT DWIFB
THE ABILITY TO COMPENSATORY
EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE WHY RAPS
SHUT DOWN BY ADAM SCHIFF
TRYING TO ASK GHEZ CLOSED-DOOR
HEARINGS LITERALLY A TOOK
PLACE IN THE BASEMENT.
THIS HAS BEEN POLITICAL FROM
THE START.
IF YOU WANT TO TALK FAIRNESS
THINK ABOUT THIS OVER 70
DEMOCRATS VOTED TO IMPEACH THE
PRESIDENT BEFORE THE JULY
PHONE CALL, WHEN WOULD BE
IMPETUS FOR THE ARTICLES OF
IMPEACHMENT, 17 OF THE
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
DEMOCRAT JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
MEMBERS VOTED TO IMPEACH
BEFORE THAT PHONE CALL IN HAS
BEEN SLANTDZ UNFAIR BIASED THE
ON BIPARTISAN VOTES HAD BEEN
TO STOP IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY
HAS BEEN AGAINST IMPEACHING
THE PRESIDENT, SO AGAIN, THIS
IS A POLITICAL PROCESS.
MITCH MCCONNELL CAN WORK WITH
THE PRESIDENT, AND A FEW
THINGS THAT THAT IS IN FAIR
LOOK WHAT ADAM SCHIFF DID, ARE
CHAIRMAN NADLER, NANCY PELOSI.
>> DO YOU THINK THE PUBLIC AT
THIS POINT DESERVES TO HEAR
FROM MICK MULVANEY FROM
AMBASSADOR BOLTON ABOUT WHAT
REALLY HAPPENED?
I MEAN THAT IS AT THE HEART OF
THE DISAGREEMENT WITH THE
SENATE RIGHT NOW.
O DO I WANT TO HEAR WHAT THOSE
TWO PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THIS
WHOLE INCIDENT OR DOES IT NOT
INTEREST YOU?
>> WELL, THERE IS A WHOLE
PROCESS FOR DOING THAT, THE
PROCESS IS JUST WHAT WAS USED
IN THE FAST AND FURIOUS
SCANDAL THAT IS THIS SUBPOENAS
ISSUED EXECUTIVE BRANCH FALLS
BACK ON EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
HASHED OUT IN COURTS THAT WAS
STARTED BUT BECAUSE IT DID NOT
IF IT WITH DEMOCRATS POLITICAL
TIME LINE THEY JUVEND TO
IMPEACHMENT AS LAWYER I WOULD
SAY THIS ISSUE IS NOT RIGHT
MAINTAINING NOT WHERE HAD TO
BE LITIGATED NOT RED FOR A
SECURITY TO DECIDE HAS BEEN
SKEWERED FROM START BECAUSE
DEMOCRATS HAVE NOT ALLOWED
THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
TO WORK THIS OUT.
>> BUT DO YOU WANT TO HEAR
FROM THEM?
ARE THOSE TWO PEOPLE YOU WANT
TO HIGHER FROM.
>> I HAVE TRANSCRIPT OF PHONE
CALL BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP
AND PRESIDENT ZELENSKY I DON'T
NORTHEAST SOMEBODY'S THOUGHTS
STEALINGS ASSUMPTIONS ON THAT
PHONE CALL I HAVE READ THE
TRANSCRIPT IT SHOWS NO QUID
PRO QUO IF WE HAVE PRIMARY
SOURCE DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPT WHY
DO WE NEED ALL THESE OTHER
INDIVIDUALS TO TALK ABOUT
THEIR PERCEPTION OF THE CALL?
WE HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE
CALL.
>> I CON GRAT LATED
REPUBLICANS AND YOURSELVES FOR
ACTUALLY STICKING TOGETHER ON
A MESSAGE ABOUT THE UNFAIRNESS
OF WHAT WENT ON IN THE HOUSE,
I THINK THAT THE SENATE I MEAN
NANCY PELOSI, BASICALLY WITH
SCHUMER WANTED TO CONVEY THAT
SAME OR TAKE THAT SAME MANTLE
DEALING WITH THE SENATE.
ARE YOU SENSING AMONGST YOUR
DEMOCRAT COLLEAGUES IN THE
HOUSE RESISTANCE THIS IDEA
PELOSI IS HOLDING BACK THE
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT THERE
IS ANY SORT OF GRUMBLING ABOUT
THAT?
IT SEEMS TO ME PEOPLE ARE
REALLY AT WIT'S END THEY THINK
THIS IS AN EXTREMELY RADICAL
THING THAT SHE HAS DONE.
>> WELL HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO
BE ONE OF THESE DEMOCRATS IN A
BATTLE GROUND DISTRICT MEANING
DEMOCRATS PRESIDENT TRUMP WON
THAT DISTRICT THEY WALKED
PLANK FOR NANCY PELOSI VOTED
FOR IMPEACHMENT, NANCY PELOSI
DOESN'T SEND THE ARTICLES TO
THE SENATE WALKING THE PLANK
FOR THEM ALL NOR NAUGHT THEY
HAVE TO ANSWER FOR THAT IN
2020 DEFLECTSS WHEN GOING TO
GET PUMMELED, OVER THEIR VOTES
TO IMPEACH A PRESIDENT THE
PRESIDENT WHEN WEATHER WON
THEIR DISTRICT YEAH THEY
SHOULD BE RESENTFUL YOU HAVE
TO REMEMBER, NANCY PELOSI IS
REALLY NOT THE ONE IN CHARGE
OF THE DEMOCRATS PARTY, THE
PEOPLE IN CHARGE ARE THE FAR
LEFT RADICAL FRESHMAN AOC
TALIB OMAR MODERATE FRESH FOR
DEMOCRATS IN BATTLE GROUND
DISTRICTS SHOULD BE MORE UPSET
WITH FAR LEFT RADICAL WING I
ALWAYS SAY IF YOU WANT TO KNOW
WHAT NANCY PELOSI IS GOING TO
DO TOMORROW JUST READ AOC'S

Share Video:

Embed Video: