Fox News

Fox News 24 Jan 2020

Dan Crenshaw rips Dems' 'weak' impeachment case

Description:

Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw talks impeachment, the 2020 race and Al Gore comparing climate change to September 11.

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),


House Homeland Security Committee member, author of new book ‘Fortitude,' Rep. Dan Crenshaw joins ‘Fox and Friends.' #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),
House Democrats reach deal with White House on coronavirus bill; Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz reacts. #FoxNews
Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-TX, reacts to Democrats' push to turn Texas blue. #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC),
In Part 4 of this exclusive One America News special report, Chanel Rion continues her Ukraine investigation to dismantle the Democrats' baseless impeachment case against President Trump. Take a deeper look into the Biden cover-up, money laundering schemes, bribes, millions in U.S. tax dollars, and so much more!

Tune in on Saturday, February 29th at 10 p.m. EST / 7 p.m. PST to watch -- only on One America News!

… show captions ↓
♪ ♪ ♪ STEVE: LIVE AUDIENCE SHOW.
♪ STEVE: LIVE AUDIENCE SHOW. WELCOME BACK, 5 HOURS FROM RIGHT
WELCOME BACK, 5 HOURS FROM RIGHT NOW IT WOULD BE DAY 4 OF THE
NOW IT WOULD BE DAY 4 OF THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL
SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL SCHEDULED TO KICK OFF IN THE
SCHEDULED TO KICK OFF IN THE U.S. SENATE.
U.S. SENATE. AINSLEY: DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE
AINSLEY: DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE WITNESSES, REPUBLICANS SAY
WITNESSES, REPUBLICANS SAY THERE’S ONE AGREE THAT THEY
THERE’S ONE AGREE THAT THEY SHOULD ALL AGREE ON IS HUNTER
SHOULD ALL AGREE ON IS HUNTER BIDEN.
BIDEN. BRIAN: MEMBER OF HOUSE COMMITTEE
BRIAN: MEMBER OF HOUSE COMMITTEE FORMER NAVY SEAL HIMSELF,
FORMER NAVY SEAL HIMSELF, CONGRESSMAN DAN CRENSHAW IS
CONGRESSMAN DAN CRENSHAW IS HERE.
HERE. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]
[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] >> YOU KNOW THE STATE INSIDE AND
>> YOU KNOW THE STATE INSIDE AND OUT, BASICALLY GETTING WHAT YOU
OUT, BASICALLY GETTING WHAT YOU HAD TO DIGEST BY THE SAME PEOPLE
HAD TO DIGEST BY THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WERE DELIVERING IT BEFORE
THAT WERE DELIVERING IT BEFORE CHRISTMAS, NOW WE GET IT AFTER
CHRISTMAS, NOW WE GET IT AFTER CHRISTMAS, PEOPLE ARE ACTING
CHRISTMAS, PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE WE NEVER HEARD IT BEFORE.
LIKE WE NEVER HEARD IT BEFORE. >> YOU KNOW, THAT’S THEIR JOB TO
>> YOU KNOW, THAT’S THEIR JOB TO PRESENT THEIR WEAK CASE TO THE
PRESENT THEIR WEAK CASE TO THE SENATE AND THE SENATE’S JOB TO
SENATE AND THE SENATE’S JOB TO ADJUDICATE THAT.
ADJUDICATE THAT. THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT IS
THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING, WHAT WE ARE SEEING,
HAPPENING, WHAT WE ARE SEEING, WE STILL HAVE A VERY WEAK CASE,
WE STILL HAVE A VERY WEAK CASE, THE REEXPLAINING SOME OF THE
THE REEXPLAINING SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ALREADY KNEW, WAS
THINGS THAT WE ALREADY KNEW, WAS TRUMP INTERESTED IN THE BIDEN
TRUMP INTERESTED IN THE BIDEN BARISMA ISSUE?
BARISMA ISSUE? YES, HE HAS A DUTY TO BE
YES, HE HAS A DUTY TO BE INTERESTED IN THAT, ON ITS FACE
INTERESTED IN THAT, ON ITS FACE IT WAS A CORRUPT ISSUE, CLEAR
IT WAS A CORRUPT ISSUE, CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. THAT’S THE HEART OF THE ENTIRE
THAT’S THE HEART OF THE ENTIRE CASE, WHETHER OR NOT OUR
CASE, WHETHER OR NOT OUR PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK
PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS CLEARLY A CORRUPT
INTO WHAT WAS CLEARLY A CORRUPT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUNTER
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUNTER BIDEN AND BARISMA AND THE VICE
BIDEN AND BARISMA AND THE VICE PRESIDENT THREATENING TO
PRESIDENT THREATENING TO WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN
WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN AID IN THE UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR
AID IN THE UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR WASN’T FIRED WHO WAS
WASN’T FIRED WHO WAS INVESTIGATING THE COMPANY THAT
INVESTIGATING THE COMPANY THAT HIS SON WAS ON.
HIS SON WAS ON. AINSLEY: WHY DID THEY LET HIM
AINSLEY: WHY DID THEY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT?
GET AWAY WITH IT? IF YOU DON’T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR
IF YOU DON’T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR THEN I’M NOT GIVING YOU THE
THEN I’M NOT GIVING YOU THE MONEY, THAT’S QUID PRO QUO AND
MONEY, THAT’S QUID PRO QUO AND HE ADMITS IT.
HE ADMITS IT. >> RIGHT, THAT’S THE QUESTION WE
>> RIGHT, THAT’S THE QUESTION WE ALL ASK AND POINT TO, IT’S
ALL ASK AND POINT TO, IT’S MASSIVE HYPOCRISY, IT REALLY IS,
MASSIVE HYPOCRISY, IT REALLY IS, AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SHIFT AND
AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SHIFT AND PROJECT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE,
PROJECT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE, SAYING IT’S DEBUNK AND I DON’T
SAYING IT’S DEBUNK AND I DON’T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, HOW IS IT
KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, HOW IS IT DEBUNKED, WE HAVE ALL THE FACTS,
DEBUNKED, WE HAVE ALL THE FACTS, THEY ARE NOT DISPUTABLE AT ALL,
THEY ARE NOT DISPUTABLE AT ALL, A LOT OF WITNESSES COMING
A LOT OF WITNESSES COMING FORWARD AND ADMITTED THAT, THEY
FORWARD AND ADMITTED THAT, THEY SAID THIS WAS A SERIOUS CONFLICT
SAID THIS WAS A SERIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
OF INTEREST. >> WOULD THE PRESIDENT HAVE MADE
>> WOULD THE PRESIDENT HAVE MADE HIS CASE BETTER, I WAS
HIS CASE BETTER, I WAS INTERESTED, IT WOULD HAVE
INTERESTED, IT WOULD HAVE AFFECTED 2016 AND NOT 2020,
AFFECTED 2016 AND NOT 2020, WOULD THAT HAVE HELPED?
WOULD THAT HAVE HELPED? >> YEAH, AND THAT IS WHAT THE
>> YEAH, AND THAT IS WHAT THE PRESIDENT WAS LOOKING FOR, HE
PRESIDENT WAS LOOKING FOR, HE DID HAVE CONCERNS THAT MANY
DID HAVE CONCERNS THAT MANY UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS WERE -- WERE
UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS WERE -- WERE OPENLY AGAINST HIM IN 2016
OPENLY AGAINST HIM IN 2016 ELECTION, AND, YOU KNOW, LAST
ELECTION, AND, YOU KNOW, LAST NIGHT AS THEY THE HOUSE MANAGERS
NIGHT AS THEY THE HOUSE MANAGERS WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CASE,
WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CASE, THEY KEPT BRIG UP INVESTIGATIONS
THEY KEPT BRIG UP INVESTIGATIONS BUT THEY CAREFULLY LEAVE OUT
BUT THEY CAREFULLY LEAVE OUT THAT INVESTIGATIONS WAS A BROAD
THAT INVESTIGATIONS WAS A BROAD SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT
SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT INCLUDE 2016 ELECTION, AND SO
INCLUDE 2016 ELECTION, AND SO THE QUESTION WAS THIS ABOUT 2016
THE QUESTION WAS THIS ABOUT 2016 OR 2020?
OR 2020? THERE’S NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER
THERE’S NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT ANY OF THIS WAS ABOUT 2020,
THAT ANY OF THIS WAS ABOUT 2020, BUT THAT’S THE PREMISE OF THE
BUT THAT’S THE PREMISE OF THE DEMOCRATS’ CASE.
DEMOCRATS’ CASE. >> ALSO MAKING NEWS IN THE LAST
>> ALSO MAKING NEWS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS, THE DEPARTMENT OF
24 HOURS, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ESSENTIALLY SAID THEY
JUSTICE ESSENTIALLY SAID THEY SCREWED UP AND SENT CLASSIFIED
SCREWED UP AND SENT CLASSIFIED REPORT TO THE DOJ THAT SAID
REPORT TO THE DOJ THAT SAID ESSENTIALLY TO THE FISA COURT
ESSENTIALLY TO THE FISA COURT THAT SAID DOJ PROBABLY DID NOT
THAT SAID DOJ PROBABLY DID NOT HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR TWO OF
HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR TWO OF THOSE FISA WARRANTS WHICH MEANT
THOSE FISA WARRANTS WHICH MEANT THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN
THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATING WHICH MEANT WE
INVESTIGATING WHICH MEANT WE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING
WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE RIGHT NOW LIKE THIS IN 2020
ELSE RIGHT NOW LIKE THIS IN 2020 IN NOVEMBER, THERE’S GOING TO BE
IN NOVEMBER, THERE’S GOING TO BE AN ELECTION, ELIZABETH WARREN
AN ELECTION, ELIZABETH WARREN WOULD LIKE TO BE THE PRESIDENT
WOULD LIKE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SHE WAS IN
OF THE UNITED STATES, SHE WAS IN GRIMES, IOWA ON MONDAY AND A GUY
GRIMES, IOWA ON MONDAY AND A GUY CAME UP TO HER AND HE DIDN’T
CAME UP TO HER AND HE DIDN’T KNOW HE WAS ON CAMERA BUT THERE
KNOW HE WAS ON CAMERA BUT THERE WAS A MICROPHONE NEAR AND HE IS
WAS A MICROPHONE NEAR AND HE IS VERY FRUSTRATED THAT SHE WANTS
VERY FRUSTRATED THAT SHE WANTS TO GIVE AWAY COLLEGE AND FORGIVE
TO GIVE AWAY COLLEGE AND FORGIVE COLLEGE DEBT BECAUSE HE PLAYED
COLLEGE DEBT BECAUSE HE PLAYED BY THE RULES WHILE HIS FRIENDS
BY THE RULES WHILE HIS FRIENDS DIDN’T, LISTEN TO THIS.
DIDN’T, LISTEN TO THIS. >> MY DAUGHTER IS GETTING OUT OF
>> MY DAUGHTER IS GETTING OUT OF SCHOOL, I SAVED ALL OF MY MONEY.
SCHOOL, I SAVED ALL OF MY MONEY. >> GOD BLESS YOU.
>> GOD BLESS YOU. >> AM I GOING TO GET MY MONEY
>> AM I GOING TO GET MY MONEY BACK?
BACK? SO YOU’RE GOING TO PAY FOR
SO YOU’RE GOING TO PAY FOR PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T SAVE ANY MONEY
PEOPLE WHO DIDN’T SAVE ANY MONEY AND THOSE OF US WHO DID THE
AND THOSE OF US WHO DID THE RIGHT THING GET SCREWED?
RIGHT THING GET SCREWED? STEVE: HE GOES ONTO SAY, LOOK,
STEVE: HE GOES ONTO SAY, LOOK, MY NEIGHBOR, TOOK VACATION AND
MY NEIGHBOR, TOOK VACATION AND HAD A LOT OF FUN AND I PLAYED BY
HAD A LOT OF FUN AND I PLAYED BY THE RULES, IS THAT FAIR?
THE RULES, IS THAT FAIR? >> HE’S ASKING QUESTIONS THAT A
>> HE’S ASKING QUESTIONS THAT A LOT OF AMERICANS WOULD LIKE TO
LOT OF AMERICANS WOULD LIKE TO ASK, IT’S A FALSE SENSE OF
ASK, IT’S A FALSE SENSE OF COMPASSION THAT THEY ARE
COMPASSION THAT THEY ARE OFFERING, THEY ALWAYS CLOAK
OFFERING, THEY ALWAYS CLOAK THEIR POLICIES IN COMPASSION BUT
THEIR POLICIES IN COMPASSION BUT IT’S A LIE, THIS ISN’T FAIR,
IT’S A LIE, THIS ISN’T FAIR, IT’S NOT FAIR TO TAKE FROM OTHER
IT’S NOT FAIR TO TAKE FROM OTHER PEOPLE AND GIVE TO SOMEONE ELSE
PEOPLE AND GIVE TO SOMEONE ELSE JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT THEIR
JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT THEIR VOTES, THAT’S THE DEFINITION OF
VOTES, THAT’S THE DEFINITION OF BUYING VOTES.
BUYING VOTES. >> IS THAT WHAT’S HAPPENING?
>> IS THAT WHAT’S HAPPENING? >> IF YOU LOOK AT THE PANDERING
>> IF YOU LOOK AT THE PANDERING THAT THE CANDIDATES DO IT’S
THAT THE CANDIDATES DO IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT GETTING VOTES, WE
ALWAYS ABOUT GETTING VOTES, WE WILL GIVE YOU SOMETHING IN
WILL GIVE YOU SOMETHING IN RETURN WE WANT YOUR VOTES, WE
RETURN WE WANT YOUR VOTES, WE WANT YOUR SUPPORT, THAT’S
WANT YOUR SUPPORT, THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING,
EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING, BUT, NO, YOU CANNOT TAKE THE
BUT, NO, YOU CANNOT TAKE THE TAXES AWAY FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE
TAXES AWAY FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE PAID OFF THEIR STUDENT LOANS OR
PAID OFF THEIR STUDENT LOANS OR PEOPLE WHO GOT VOCATIONAL
PEOPLE WHO GOT VOCATIONAL TRAINING CERTIFICATE INSTEAD,
TRAINING CERTIFICATE INSTEAD, WORKING HARD, YOU WANT TO TAKE
WORKING HARD, YOU WANT TO TAKE THEIR TAX MONEY AND PAY SOMEBODY
THEIR TAX MONEY AND PAY SOMEBODY ELSE’S INVESTMENT BECAUSE IT
ELSE’S INVESTMENT BECAUSE IT ISN’T A LOAN, IT’S YOUR CHOICE
ISN’T A LOAN, IT’S YOUR CHOICE TO DO IT AND YOU NEED TO PAY
TO DO IT AND YOU NEED TO PAY THAT BACK.
THAT BACK. BRIAN: PEOPLE WHO DO PAY IT BACK
BRIAN: PEOPLE WHO DO PAY IT BACK LOOK LIKE SUCKERS, THAT’S BEEN
LOOK LIKE SUCKERS, THAT’S BEEN THE THEME ON THE LEFT.
THE THEME ON THE LEFT. AINSLEY: LIKE IF YOU PAID FOR
AINSLEY: LIKE IF YOU PAID FOR YOUR KIDS TO GO TO COLLEGE AND
YOUR KIDS TO GO TO COLLEGE AND SHE COMES IN, YOU’VE ALREADY
SHE COMES IN, YOU’VE ALREADY PAID YOUR MONEY, SHE COMES IN
PAID YOUR MONEY, SHE COMES IN AND GETS ELECTED, YOUR TAX
AND GETS ELECTED, YOUR TAX DOLLARS SHE’S GOING TAKE TO GO
DOLLARS SHE’S GOING TAKE TO GO PAY OFF SOMEONE ELSE’S STUDENT
PAY OFF SOMEONE ELSE’S STUDENT LOAN, IS THAT FAIR, NO.
LOAN, IS THAT FAIR, NO. BRIAN: AL GORE WAS ON THE RECORD
BRIAN: AL GORE WAS ON THE RECORD YESTERDAY FROM DAVOS SAYING THAT
YESTERDAY FROM DAVOS SAYING THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS LIKE 911, HE
CLIMATE CHANGE IS LIKE 911, HE COMPARES THE TWO, DO YOU?
COMPARES THE TWO, DO YOU? >> NO, NO WE SHOULD NOT COMPARE
>> NO, NO WE SHOULD NOT COMPARE THE TWO.
THE TWO. IT’S -- IT’S ALMOST A LAUGHABLE
IT’S -- IT’S ALMOST A LAUGHABLE EXPLANATION, HE ALSO -- THEY
EXPLANATION, HE ALSO -- THEY COMPARE TO WORLD WAR II, THEY
COMPARE TO WORLD WAR II, THEY COMPARE IT TO STORMING THE
COMPARE IT TO STORMING THE BEACHES OF NORMANDY, THEY ARE
BEACHES OF NORMANDY, THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE THIS INSANE
TRYING TO CREATE THIS INSANE ALARMISM AND CRISIS MODE BECAUSE
ALARMISM AND CRISIS MODE BECAUSE THEY WANT YOU TO GIVE THEM
THEY WANT YOU TO GIVE THEM POWER, RIGHT, THEY BELIEVE THAT
POWER, RIGHT, THEY BELIEVE THAT THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN HAVE THE
THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN HAVE THE POWER TO REFORM THE ECONOMY IN
POWER TO REFORM THE ECONOMY IN THE WAY THAT THEY WANT IS TO --
THE WAY THAT THEY WANT IS TO -- IS TO DRIVE OUR KIDS INTO HAS
IS TO DRIVE OUR KIDS INTO HAS HYSTERIA AND PRETEND THAT WE ARE
HYSTERIA AND PRETEND THAT WE ARE STORMING THE BEACHES OF
STORMING THE BEACHES OF NORMANDY, IT’S NONSENSE, IT
NORMANDY, IT’S NONSENSE, IT DOESN’T MEAN THAT WE CAN’T TAKE
DOESN’T MEAN THAT WE CAN’T TAKE THE ISSUE SERIOUSLY, WE SHOULD,
THE ISSUE SERIOUSLY, WE SHOULD, WE SHOULD LOOK AT WHAT’S WORKED.
WE SHOULD LOOK AT WHAT’S WORKED. THE UNITED STATES HAS DECREASED
THE UNITED STATES HAS DECREASED EMISSIONS FAR MORE THAN THE LAST
EMISSIONS FAR MORE THAN THE LAST 10 COUNTRIES COMBINED?
10 COUNTRIES COMBINED? HOW HAVE WE DONE THAT?
HOW HAVE WE DONE THAT? TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN, FRACKING, THE
TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN, FRACKING, THE NUMBER ONE DRIVER OF REDUCTION
NUMBER ONE DRIVER OF REDUCTION OF EMISSIONS, WE SHOULD BE
OF EMISSIONS, WE SHOULD BE BUILDING PIPELINES SO NEW YORK
BUILDING PIPELINES SO NEW YORK AND BOSTON DOESN’T HAVE TO RELY
AND BOSTON DOESN’T HAVE TO RELY ON RUSSIAN IMPORT.
ON RUSSIAN IMPORT. THERE’S REALLY OBVIOUS WAYS TO
THERE’S REALLY OBVIOUS WAYS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS GLOBALLY AND
REDUCE EMISSIONS GLOBALLY AND THEY DON’T WANT TO HEAR THAT,
THEY DON’T WANT TO HEAR THAT, THEY WANT TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE
THEY WANT TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE GROUND, SKYROCKETING ELECTRICITY
GROUND, SKYROCKETING ELECTRICITY PRICES.
PRICES. BRIAN: THEY WANT THE ISSUE, THEY
BRIAN: THEY WANT THE ISSUE, THEY DON’T WANT TO ANSWER.
DON’T WANT TO ANSWER. >> THEY WANT TO SCARE YOU AND
>> THEY WANT TO SCARE YOU AND MAKE YOU BELIEVE, OKAY, IF WE DO
MAKE YOU BELIEVE, OKAY, IF WE DO ALL THE THINGS, KEEP IT ON THE
ALL THE THINGS, KEEP IT ON THE GROUND, HAVE NO ENERGY
GROUND, HAVE NO ENERGY WHATSOEVER, JUST SOLAR AND WIND,
WHATSOEVER, JUST SOLAR AND WIND, ALL OF A SUDDEN WEATHER WILL
ALL OF A SUDDEN WEATHER WILL LOOK LIKE SAN DIEGO.
LOOK LIKE SAN DIEGO. STEVE: DAN CRENSHAW, THANK YOU

Share Video:

Embed Video: